Quantcast
Channel: AmeriCorps
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 84

Improving student reading skills through tutoring

$
0
0

Abstract: 

Nationwide, AmeriCorps programs have answered the call to help ensure all children can read by third grade. The AmeriCorps Tutoring Outcomes Study found that students tutored by AmeriCorps members improved their reading performance more than the gain expected of a typical child at their grade level. The research study also found students made the most gains in programs when they met with their tutors at least three times per week and when programs conducted formal evaluations, trained tutors both prior to and during the tutoring program, and were moderately or fully implemented.

Authorization: 

on

Service Activities: 

Type: 

Program, Financial, and Grant Management: 

Groups: 

Knowledge Networks: 

Improving the educational achievement of American children and youth has become increasingly important due to the globalization of the economy and the expanding demands of a technological society. To succeed in this new environment, children and adults alike must be able to read and comprehend text without difficulty. Reading skills are critical for successful academic performance and meaningful professional and personal development. Reading performance in the early grades is particularly important since it is a key determinant of future academic success.

There are few large, well-controlled studies that examine the effectiveness of school-based volunteer activities, and little evidence exists to support the effectiveness of tutoring as a way to teach reading to students who are having difficulty. The AmeriCorps Tutoring Outcomes Study set out to determine whether AmeriCorps tutoring programs were in fact positively impacting the reading skills of thousands of children.

AmeriCorps tutoring programs do make a difference – more than 70 percent of programs implemented tutoring practices that the research found to be effective in helping struggling students learn to read. The following four program-level effective tutoring practices were significantly related (both individually and in combination) to the greatest gains in student reading skills:

  • Tutoring sessions occur at least three times a week. About half (53 percent) of the program directors reported that tutors met with students at least three times a week. A quarter of the program directors indicated that tutors met daily with students. Students in programs where they met with their tutors at least three times per week increased their reading skills scores between pre-test and post-test by 2.1 points more than their peers in programs that met less frequently.
  • Tutors receive training both prior to and during the course of tutoring. The majority of program directors (80 percent) noted that training occurred both prior to and during the program year. Students in programs where tutors received training both during and prior to tutoring obtained gains of 2.3 points more on the reading test than students in programs where tutors did not have such training.
  • Program is at least moderately or fully implemented. A fully implemented program is one in which all of the components are available and functioning as planned (e.g., staff are hired and working with students, materials are selected and onsite, participants are recruited and involved in activities). One-third of the program directors indicated that their program was fully implemented, with another 47 percent indicating moderate implementation (i.e., most but not all components in place and operating as planned). Thus, 80 percent of programs could be characterized as either fully or moderately implemented. Programs near or at full implementation were more likely to be successful.
  • Programs evaluate the effectiveness of their tutoring activities. The majority of program directors (73 percent) reported that they conduct a formal evaluation. Information from the evaluation can contribute to program improvement.

Students participating in AmeriCorps tutoring programs improved their reading performance from pre-test to post-test more than the gain expected for the typical child at their grade level. Reading comprehension and reading skills started out below grade-level; by year-end, students closed the gap and were reading at or near the grade-level expectation. This finding holds for students at all grade levels tested (first, second, and third). Not only are the gains statistically significant, they are also large enough to signify real improvement in students' reading abilities. The magnitude of the reading gains was the same for students of different ethnic and racial backgrounds.

The study also examined the relationship between tutoring programming and gains in reading comprehension. Programs where tutors did not coordinate their tutoring practices with classroom instruction were associated with larger student gains. Since the relationship is counterintuitive, it merits additional exploration. No other program-level components were significantly related to gains in reading comprehension. Even though students made significant gains in reading comprehension, the gains were not related to program-level effective practices. The results from the study suggest that effective practices, such as the frequency of tutoring sessions, may have greater impact on students' reading mechanics than on reading comprehension.

Students participating in programs with all four effective practices implemented were likely to show the greatest gains in reading skills compared to their counterparts in programs that had three or fewer of these tutoring practices. The fact that effective tutoring practices were related to student reading skill gains increases the likelihood that these gains can be attributed to the AmeriCorps program, rather than other program factors that might also explain the differences in student reading outcomes. Students in programs with all four effective practices gained an average of 5.4 points between pre-test and post-test, which is significantly more than students in programs with three practices, who gained only 2.5 points. Students in programs that reported none of the four effective practices gained less than one point on the reading test. Results are based on pre-test and post-test data from 869 students in grades one, two, and three receiving tutoring services in 68 programs serving 93 schools nationwide. Trained field staff administered a standardized reading test at the beginning of tutoring and at the end of the school year to students in grades one, two, and three. In addition to student test data, 293 tutors and 369 teachers provided further information through rating scales and activity records collected at the same two points in time. Teachers also rated students' classroom behaviors at the same time points.

Citations: 

Moss, M., Swartz, J., Obeidallah, D., Stewart, G., & Greene, D. (2001, February). AmeriCorps tutoring outcomes study. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.

Bookmark and Share

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 84

Trending Articles